mislead groups

Question ID: 30769

Assalamualaikum,Mufti Saheb.I would like to know the truth & Islamic status of the views of an Alim who calls himself Sunni,Hanafi & Deobandi.These are his views quoted from his talks:1)There was no introduction of the ulama of Deoband in Arab.2)Imam saheb(Abu Hanifa) has met two Sahaba(ra).3)Fathima(ra) became displeased.It is natural.Not that she had greed for things.She would think that Abu Bakr(ra) did not give them heritage,whereas it was their right.So she got displeased because of the right,and the saying of Hazrat Ali(ra):’You people did not share with us’.This is also right that then the council which took place about Khilafat,Ali(ra) was not present in that.He was present there in giving bath that exactly at that time this issue arose,and his stand was that at least he had some right because of the relationship.4)Now Saa’d bin Ubadah did not accept(Abu Bakr(ra)as Khalifa),he did not accept till end.Khalid bin Saeed bin Aas did not accept,Ali did not accept.He took Bai’ah after the demise of Hazrat Fathima(ra).Khalid bin Saeed also had spent 4 or 5 months,then he took Bai’ah.5)A Khariji was brought before Abdul Malik bin Marwan.He scolded him,’Why they always fight?He asked,’Why the Prophet of Allah did not appoint Khalifa?Abdul Malik kept quiet.The Khariji said,’He did not do it because difference had to remain in ummah,so he left it to the will of Allah’.I liked this answer very much.6)Hazrat Ali(ra) said:’We have complaint that we had to be included.And the matter was right that they were the closest relatives and they also were right that they had not gone there with any plan.Such an uproar had created there that if it had not been dealt with immediately,do not know what would have happened.On the first day itself ummah would have divided into 2 groups.So respect everybody.7)Read the discourses of Hazrat Thanvi(rah);there is no way for a common man to benefit from it.The language is so complicated and scholarly.It seemed that there used to be mostly ulama before Hazrat Thanvi(rah),and common people also were such that whose scholarly desire,consciousness was awake.So the writings of our elders were very complicated.There was scholarly appearance,scholarly hue in that.Moududi saheb is the first person who presented Deen in easily comprehensible way,and people understood that also.8)The maslak of Jumhoor is that Prophets are alive in their graves with respect to body and soul…but the matter which emerged,which was started by Moulana Husain Ali…on the arrival of Qari Tayyib saheb,from the Mamatis Moulana Ghulamullah Khan had retracted.9)This is an addition of Moulvi Shahid saheb.Moulana Zakariyya did not write any booklet.There was an Alim who had studied at Saharanpur.He joined with Moududi saheb.Moulana Zakariyya saheb wrote him a letter.The letter was of personal sort.Grandson after him is a publisher,businessman.He published it from business point of view and gave it a very improper name ‘Fitna-e-Moududiat’.

Marked as spam
Asked on November 16, 2012 6:09 pm
Private answer
1) This has been done on a limited scale.
2) Move
3) In the beginning there was some doubt concerning the inheritance but upon clarification of Hadhrat Abu Bakr (R.A.) all doubts were removed. Hadhrat Ali (R.A.) to erase any doubt subsequently publicly took allegiance to Hadhrat Abu Bakr (R.A.). This person does not not know his own History.
4) Lack of proper history knowledge leads to such drivel
5) The non-appointment by Nabi (S.A.W) has its wisdoms but for differences.
6) This is voicing Shiasm.
7) So simplify Moulana Thanvis works. Maududis Sahib is deviate. See site for details - publications - Maududism is Shia pocket edition.
8) What is being said, I do not understand?
9) The content matter of the letter was/is Valid and still stands.
Marked as spam
Answered on November 16, 2012 6:09 pm